jump to navigation

is god colorblind? (part one) 2006.10.03

Posted by Hakuna in christian, ethnicity & culture, racism.
1 comment so far

there’s an interesting article in the new york times today entitled, “a racial rift that isn’t black and white” (free-registration required). it’s about two ministers – one latino and one african american – in the south who have a strong friendship in the midst significant tensions between their respective ethnic communities.


The Revs. Atanacio Gaona, left, and Harvey Williams Jr. in Willacoochee, Ga., where the two men each have a church. They have forged a friendship that transcends the divide between Hispanics and blacks.

it’s a hopeful article (which in the news nowadays is difficult to find), but i found one comment that rev. gaona, the latino pastor, makes very disturbing. what he said was said with the best of intentions and i have heard many christians say exactly this kind of thing over the years. in the article, while describing the close nature of his relationship with pastor williams, rev. gaona is quoted as saying,

In the eyes of the Lord, there are no colors.

nothing could be further from the truth rev. gaona! scripture clearly supports the very opposite notion: ethnicity, culture and language are eternal.

in the book of revelations, the apostle john describes his vision of heaven and the end times. in chapter 7, he paints a picture of god’s heavenly throne room and there, he says in verse 9,

After this I looked and there before me was a great multitude that no one could count, from every nation, tribe, people and language, standing before the throne and in front of the Lamb. They were wearing white robes and were holding palm branches in their hands.

so, here’s the scene: john is bearing witness to the last act in the drama of human redemptive history. there’s an immense assemblage before god’s heavenly throne and although all are clothed in white, john “sees” people from every nation (ethnos) and tribe. he also “hears” a multitude of languages being used to worship the lord god almighty.

there’s a lot about life in heaven that scripture is silent on and until we get there, we are left to ponder, speculate and imagine about the rest. one of the preciously few things that god has made absolutely clear to us about the kingdom of heaven is that it is thoroughly multi-ethnic and multi-lingual. ethnicity, culture and language are apparently so precious to god that he has deemed them to be eternal aspects of our personal and communal identities. in essence, they are a fundamental part of our souls.

the “eyes of the lord” are not color-blind! furthermore, those who perpetuate the idea that unity depends on our ability to either tolerate or ignore difference do greater harm than they realize. it is a crime against both heaven and earth.

understanding shalom 2006.10.02

Posted by Hakuna in christian, globalization, justice.
add a comment

shalom: the bible’s word for salvation, justice and peace is one of texts that the think-tank i mentioned in my last post studied and it’s author, dr. perry b. yoder was one of our special instructors/advisors. this is an excellent book and i highly recommend it. (plus it’s short and inexpensive!)

if you need anymore convincing: a few years ago, we invited dr. dallas willard to come and teach at one of our week-long training events. i gave him a copy of this book and asked him for his feedback because it was helping to shape significant parts of our organization. he graciously read the book that week and said that it was a “great book”.

he elaborated further by saying that dr. yoder’s book filled a vacuum in our evangelical understanding of the life of faith. however, shalom should not be confused as the “goal” of our lives as people of faith. shalom is the “fruit” of the kingdom of god and we are to partner with god in the work of establishing his kingdom’s reign and authority here on earth. shalom in the earth will be the natural state of god’s established kingdom.

globalization & shalom broken 2006.10.02

Posted by Hakuna in christian, globalization, justice.
add a comment

a number of years ago, i was privileged to be a part of a think-tank that invested a significant amount of time and money into the study and development of shalom theology. we studied both the biblical/hebrew definition of shalom as well as its practical implications for our world today.

shalom or salaam (arabic) to my great surprise did not simply mean “peace”. biblically, it means much more than that. the word embodies the conecpts of justice, peace, righteousness and prosperity or in other words, holistic well-being. the think-tank discovered that in the english version of the old testament, numerous words such as “well”, “happy”, “friendly”, “welfare”, and “health” have been translated from the hebrew word shalom. most often, shalom is used in a communal sense as well; we in the west tend to think exclusively in individualistic terms.

a beautiful description of shalom that i have seen in the bible is,

love and faithfulness meet together; righteousness and peace kiss each other. (pslam 85:10)

one of the pracitical implications of the brokenness of shalom that we looked at was globalization. globalization has greatly served the developed countries of the world by creating new markets and trade partners for our goods (everything from big macs to hollywood movies) as well as cheap labor (from sweatshops producing trendy clothing and athletic shoes to customer service/technical support for major telecommunications companies). it has done little to truly benefit the majority 2/3 world though. (i confess that this is an overly simplistic assessment because there have been tremendous gains from globalization as well – medicine and technology have greatly benefited many in the world.)

the article from the new york times that i want to highlight below ends with this,

africa has long been a dumping ground for all sorts of things the developed world has no use for. ‘this is the underbelly of globalization’

the excerpt below reminded me of how broken shalom is on the earth. it also caused me to wonder how much of our lives in the developed world come at the expense of the world’s poor. i don’t think there are any easy answers to that question, but the question should definitely be asked and not ignored.

from everyone who has been given much, much will be demanded; and from the one who has been entrusted with much, much more will be asked. (luke 12:48b)

October 2, 2006

Global Sludge Ends in Tragedy for Ivory Coast
By LYDIA POLGREEN and MARLISE SIMONS

ABIDJAN, Ivory Coast, Sept. 28 — It was his infant son’s cries, gasping and insistent, that first woke Salif Oudrawogol one night last month. The smell hit him moments later, wafting into the family’s hut, a noxious mélange reminiscent of rotten eggs, garlic and petroleum.

Mr. Oudrawogol went outside to investigate. Beside the family’s compound, near his manioc and corn fields, he saw a stinking slick of black sludge.

“The smell was so bad we were afraid,” Mr. Oudrawogol said. “It burned our noses and eyes.”

Over the next few days, the skin of his 6-month-old son, Salam, bloomed with blisters, which burst into weeping sores all over his body. The whole family suffered headaches, nosebleeds and stomach aches.

How that slick, a highly toxic cocktail of petrochemical waste and caustic soda, ended up in Mr. Oudrawogol’s backyard in a suburb north of Abidjan is a dark tale of globalization. It came from a Greek-owned tanker flying a Panamanian flag and leased by the London branch of a Swiss trading corporation whose fiscal headquarters are in the Netherlands. Safe disposal in Europe would have cost about $300,000, or perhaps twice that, counting the cost of delays. But because of decisions and actions made not only here but also in Europe, it was dumped on the doorstep of some of the world’s poorest people.

So far eight people have died, dozens have been hospitalized and 85,000 have sought medical attention, paralyzing the fragile health care system in a country divided and impoverished by civil war… (for more on this article, please go to the New York Times (registration required))

bumfights 2006.10.02

Posted by Hakuna in social commentary.
10 comments

i was shocked and appauled when i saw this piece on “bumfights” on 60 minutes (cbs) last night! it made me extremely angry and sad that we could live in a society where this type of behavior on camera can make lots of money and be imitated as leasure activity. after the article below, i have a video from youtube.com that shows you a clip from one of the bumfights videos. it’s graphic stuff so i warn you that the web-article and the video will turn your stomach — that is unless you’re one of the 300,000 or so people who bought one of these evil videos.

update: youtube.com pulled the video for “terms of use violation” but the original cbs.com 60 minutes segment can be seen at http://www.cbsnews.com/sections/i_video/main500251.shtml?id=2054122n for now. check it out before the link expires.

October 1, 2006

‘Bumfight’ Videos Inspired Joy-Killing
Florida Teen Tells Ed Bradley He Killed Homeless Man ‘For Fun’

Teenagers call it “bum-hunting” and it is a perverse national trend. Across the country, packs of teenage boys are stalking homeless people and attacking them, shooting them with paintball guns, beating them with baseball bats, even dousing them with gasoline and setting them on fire. Over the last five years, at least one homeless person has been murdered each month, for no apparent reason.

Homeless advocates say that if any other group was being targeted like this, there’d be a national outcry. But as correspondent Ed Bradley reports, the only thing that seems to spark any outrage is when one of these attacks is captured on video.

Last January in Fort Lauderdale, Fla., two teenagers were caught on video surveillance tape as they beat a homeless man with baseball bats and ran away. The man survived. But that same night, the same kids beat another homeless man, 45-year-old Norris Gaynor, to death.

Seventeen-year-old Thomas Daugherty and 18-year-old Brian Hooks were identified by more than a dozen classmates as the boys on the tape. Still, they pled “not guilty” and are awaiting trial.

Since people living on the streets usually don’t report crime, there are no reliable government statistics. But the National Coalition for the Homeless, using local news reports and other sources, says that since 1999 there have been more than 500 such attacks, resulting in 180 deaths.

One of those killed was 53-year-old Michael Roberts, who was attacked in Holly Hill, Fla. in May 2005. Four teens, aged 14 through 18 confessed to the crime, saying they stumbled across Roberts in the woods where they had gone to smoke pot. Off and on over three hours, they beat him to death.

Jeffrey Spurgeon was the oldest member of the group. “The main thing that I can’t keep out of my head. That I keep thinking about 24/7 is Michael asking for help, and asking us stop, and screaming for help,” Spurgeon says.

Bradley met Spurgeon at his new home, a state prison in Jasper, Fla., where he has been sentenced to spend the next 35 years. He told 60 Minutes his 14-year-old, 220-pound friend, Chris Scamahorn, started the attack.

“Chris woke the guy up and started hittin’ him with a stick. So we all rushed in on him and then I hit him with the stick. And then we all left,” Spurgeon recalls.

Spurgeon says they went back three times and says each time the beatings got worse.

“And the third time when we come back, that’s when Chris had brought a two by four with a nail through it. And hit the guy on top of the head with it,” Spurgeon says.

Why did they do all this?

“I guess for fun,” Spurgeon says.

“These kids were obviously dangerous. And they had no idea why,” says Circuit Court Judge Joseph Will.

He spent weeks looking at the evidence before sentencing Spurgeon and the others to spend most of their adult lives in prison, with no chance for parole.”

It’s not just a mistake. It’s a conscious act that took place over a long period of time that resulted in the brutal death of a helpless harmless man,” Judge Will says.

Why does he think they did it?”

I think they did it because there was someone less powerful than they, to pick on,” the judge says.”

Do you think that it happened because he was homeless?” Bradley asks.”

I think it happened because he was homeless and he was helpless and he was one step down on the violence pecking order from those kids,” Judge Will replies.”

This is the new sport. In many parts of the country, it’s a rite of passage,” says Brian Levin, a criminologist at California State University in San Bernardino, and an expert on hate crimes.

Why would kids start beating up homeless people?”

Most hate offenses are not committed by hard core hate-mongers,” Levin explains. “They’re often associations of young males who looking for some thrill or excitement go out and attack a target that will help validate them. And a target that they think is vulnerable. One that they can get away with. And one that has some kind of negativity associated with it.”

And Levin says no group has more negativity associated with it than the homeless, who are often stereotyped as lazy, stupid and responsible for their situation. He says in many ways, they’re one group it is still “safe” to hate.”

It used to be gays, it used to be African-Americans. But now the vogue target in many ways are the homeless,” says Levin.

“How did this become okay? I mean how did it get to a point where kidsthink we can just go out and beat somebody up, some cases kill them, and that’s alright?” Bradley asks.

“Most recently there have been a series of films, horrible brutal films that dehumanize and degrade the homeless,” says Levin, referring to the Bumfight videos.

Bumfights is a series of popular DVDs in which homeless people perform degrading stunts for which they are paid a few dollars and a lot of alcohol. They also include clips of teenagers fighting. The DVDs cost about $20 and have sold 300,000 copies over the last five years.

The videos star Rufus Hannah, a homeless man dubbed “Rufus the stunt bum,” drinking to excess, falling down, performing dangerous stunts and fighting his best friend Donnie Brennan who is also homeless.

Brennan was even branded for the video.

These days, Hannah is sober, working full-time, and involved in a civil lawsuit to recover some of the money from Bumfights. Brennan, who’s still on the streets, is also suing. Both men claim they were taken advantage of by the film-makers because they were homeless.

Brennan says he got hurt in the making of the videos. “I broke my ankle in half. I broke my leg in two places,” he says.

He says the scenes were not acting but were “down to earth real.”

Asked if they made money from the site, Hannah says, “We didn’t make a damn thing.”

“Five bucks for beer every once in a while,” Brennan adds.”

Sometimes it was only two or three dollars. See, Ryan knew that when we got drunk, he could get us to do anything,” Hannah explains.

“Ryan” is Ryan McPherson, the 23-year-old creator of Bumfights. He sold the rights to the series for $1.5 million shortly after it came out, splitting the money with three partners. But he’s still defending Bumfights in court, and in the media.”

We’re merely exposing something that I don’t think a lot of people know exists. I think it’s interesting. I can’t imagine what would make somebody do the things that Rufus was doing to himself,” McPherson says.”

Because he’s an alcoholic and somebody gave him money. You gave him money, which he used to buy alcohol. Got drunk and he did it,” Bradley remarks.”

It’s not as simple as that,” McPherson replies.

McPherson points out that felony charges for his role in Bumfights were dropped. But he did plead guilty to a misdemeanor charge of staging an illegal fight. But Bumfights is worse than you think.

In some scenes, an actor calling himself “the Bumhunter,” along with some of the film-makers, actually attack sleeping homeless people, tying them up and gagging them with duct tape. 60 Minutes showed the scenes to McPherson.

How does he defend that?”It’s a skit,” McPherson says.”

Skit? You’re sneaking up on them while they’re asleep and assaulting them. It doesn’t look like a skit. It doesn’t say, ‘Hey, this is staged. This is acting,’” Bradley remarks.

“Oh, no, no, no. I’m not saying it’s staged. It’s saying that just the way it’s, the way it’s set up,” McPherson says, laughing. “I don’t know. I mean, the bumhunter’s not an easy thing to defend.

“Yet he is defending it. “Well, I’m trying to. It’s just, you know, it’s just hard to make sense of things when they’re just so absurd. I mean it’s just so absurd. I mean this guy’s rolling around in the dirt with homeless people and we’re trying to defend the notion that we’re responsible for the deaths of homeless people,” McPherson tells Bradley.

But police investigations have directly linked Bumfights to some of the attacks against the homeless, which have been steadily increasing ever since the series came out. Professor Levin says the connection between the videos and the violence is hard to ignore.”

They’ve created a whole cultural symbol now. There are now people who are doing their own videos,” Levin explains.

In Calgary, Canada for example, five teens – bored and high on drugs – made a home video of their attack.

When they found a homeless man sleeping in an alley, they took turns kicking him, beating him with a metal pipe and even breaking a bottle on his head. The victim survived, and two of the kids spent a year in jail.

60 Minutes showed the video to Ryan McPherson.”

What do you think of that? You start out with them yelling Bumfights,” Bradley asks.”

It starts off with them on drugs. But, yes, they yell Bumfights. Ya know, there’s nothing in Bumfights that can support that,” McPherson replies.

“As you see it. But they’re the ones who did it. They saw it. In their minds that was the next step for them, the logical thing to do. They saw a connection. Do you see the connection they saw?” Bradley asks.

“Okay. Yes,” McPherson acknowledges.

“You made Bumfights,” Bradley remarks.

“Great. But you, I mean, I’m not, I’m not hopped up on drugs. I’m a kid with a video camera just shootin’ stuff,” McPherson says.

He also doesn’t think he bears any responsibility at all when he sees stories about kids going out and beating up homeless people.

Back in Florida, Jeffrey Spurgeon told 60 Minutes that he and his friends watched Bumfights “hundreds of times.”

“That was their favorite thing to do. Was watch those videos and mock whatever was on it,” he says.

By mock, Spurgeon means copy. And he said they were doing just that the night they killed Michael Roberts.

“We were just trying to mock a show,” he says.

He also tells Bradley they thought it was funny.

How is that fun?”I don’t know just exciting I guess…entertainment?” Spurgeon says.

“What in the world do you do with kids who are sitting in the bushes smoking a little pot one minute, and the next minute beating a man to death? What do you do with kids like that?” Judge Will wonders.

The judge says Bumfights never came up in this case, and he was left searching for other reasons why four kids would beat a homeless man to death.

“The one trend that saw in those kids was that they felt as though they had been bullied and pushed around by everybody in their lives up until that particular moment. And the opportunity just arose,” he says.

“What would you say to kids who might be doing this? Bum-bashing. Bum fighting,” Bradley asks Spurgeon.”

I would ask ‘em what they’re gettin’ out of it. What, what’s so fun about it,” he replies.”

And they would say, ‘But what did you get out of it? You did it,’” Bradley says.”

Yep,” Spurgeon says. “And now I could tell ‘em, ‘Look at me now though. You still have a chance. Look at me.”

©MMVI, CBS Broadcasting Inc. All Rights Reserved.

CBSNews.com: 60 Minutes - ‘Bumfight’ Videos Inspired Joy-Killing

‘ukulele 2006.09.29

Posted by Hakuna in ethnicity & culture, music.
add a comment


(pronounced: oo-kuu-leh-leh)

this musical instrument is possibly one of the most misrepresented and disrespected (next to spoons and kuzoos) in the world. jake shimabukro, hawaiian born uchinanchu (”okinawan” in the okinawan language), is a ‘ukulele musician that will instantly change your understanding of this little guitar-like instrument. 100s of google video viewers agree with me aparently agree with me given it’s 5 out of 5 star rating!

over the summer, while in hawai’i, i visited a number of musical instrument shops looking at and playing various ‘ukuleles. i fell in love with the sound and feel of gstring ‘ukuleles. you can’t hear the beautiful resonate sounds here but if you want to see the amazing craftsmanship of one of these instruments and works of art, go here: http://www.gstringukuleles.com/.

recruiting attitude 2006.09.29

Posted by Hakuna in leadership.
add a comment

this is an excerpt from patrick lencioni’s latest e-newsletter that i thought worth sharing…

PAT’S COMMENTARY:

MANAGEMENT AND YOUTH SOCCER

The big draft. You may have heard about it.

No, I’m not referring to the NFL draft that took place in April, or the NBA edition in June. I’m talking about the Mustang Boys’ Under-nine Soccer draft in Danville, California. That’s right. As ridiculous as it sounds, I’m talking about eight-year-old boys, third graders, actually getting drafted to play “competitive soccer”. And the process by which they’re evaluated, rated and selected is a site to see.

Imagine a soccer field surrounded by clip-board toting coaches (myself included) who are taking detailed notes as they watch little boys run and kick and dribble and scrimmage against one another. Afterward, those coaches sit down around a table and take turns selecting twelve players for their respective teams.

Luckily for me, I don’t know a great deal about soccer. I played very little of the sport as a grade-schooler, though I’ve coached my sons’ six and seven-year-old teams. But to be fair, the nature of the game played by my boys’ pee wee teams more closely resembled a revolt within a prison than it did a sporting event.

I say that I’m lucky to be ignorant of soccer because it forced me to confront a brutal fact: I was going to be at a distinct competitive disadvantage when it came to assessing the technical skills of the munchkins on my list of draftable players. You see, the other coaches in the league have all played soccer at collegiate, professional or semi-professional levels, and they appreciate the nuances of the sport the way I do basketball or baseball. They are the type of people who not only understand the off-sides rule, but actually like it!

Anyway, to mitigate my soccer naivete, I made a decision that was motivated mostly out of desperation, with a little inspiration mixed in. In essence, I decided to completely change the criteria I would use to evaluate and select players for my team (which, by the way, is called The Swarm).

So, I took the official evaluation form that was given to me before the try-outs, and crossed out the provided category descriptions like “speed”, “field awareness”, “touch” and “power”, and replaced them with others like “attitude”, “hustle” and “skill” and “parents”. Of course, that meant I would have to focus on observing different things than my peers would be looking for during the tryouts.

For instance, instead of spending most of my time looking at the players’ feet, I tended to watch how they treated one another. I wanted to see how they responded when the instructor asked them to help move one of the portable goals or a bag of soccer balls to the other side of the field. I also watched the way they interacted with their parents during breaks. Were they respectful or inattentive? And I wanted to see how hard they played on the field. Did they only run when the ball came to them, or did they get involved and help out on defense?

During breaks I might slyly approach one of the kids and ask, “Hey there Billy, how do you like school?” or “What’s your favorite subject?” And I was looking for someone who would say, “Yeah, I like school a lot”, or “I like math, but not spelling so much.” What I didn’t want was a blank stare or an answer like “nah, the only thing I like is recess.”

Anyway, when the tryouts were over, my assistant coach (who never played or coached soccer before) and I ranked the players from top to bottom, according to our largely attitudinal criteria. When the draft began, we nervously waited our turn. By the time the draft had ended, we had picked more of our top “prospects” than we could have imagined, and assembled a team that we felt had a very high likelihood of being positive and coachable.

Now, don’t misunderstand this philosophy of mine for altruism or nobility. I have a competitive streak too, and I wanted our team to be successful. Certainly, I value character-building and fitness more than winning, but I didn’t want to field a team full of nice kids who couldn’t score goals. And I would be lying if I said we didn’t pay any attention to the basic athletic ability of the players we selected. But those skills took a distant back seat to attitude and demeanor.

As the season approached, my assistant coach and I wondered how much talent we had on the team. We hoped we’d have at least one good goalie and a few natural scorers. By the time our first practiced was upon us, we didn’t know what to expect. So we crossed our fingers, skimmed through “Soccer For Dummies”, and began the season.

That was six weeks ago. As of the writing of this article, we’ve played a little less than half of our games, and a few things have become crystal clear to us.

First, our team is a team. They treat each other well, encourage one another, and seek out collective attention more than individual praise. Second, they’re having fun. They don’t complain about practices, and they enjoy being together. Third, their parents are having fun. Many of them have approached me and my assistant coach to tell us how pleasantly surprised they are about the positive environment on the team, and how much they enjoy being on the sideline with the other parents.

What about the soccer? So far, so good. We’ve only lost three of thirteen games, and we’ve outscored our opponents 24-7. Of course, that is not near as important as the other factors (I have to keep reminding myself and the other parents about that), but it’s a nice confirmation that our attitudinal approach is as viable on the field as it is off of it. It will be interesting to see how the team handles itself when we inevitably lose a few games in a row.

I’d like to say that this early success of the team is a result of great coaching and tactical training. But that just isn’t the case. The fact is, as Jim Collins points out in Good To Great, getting the right people on the bus is the first critical step toward building a great organization of any kind.

Once the bus is full, then it’s all about getting the right people in the right seats (or in our case, the right players in the right positions). But selecting the people who fit your culture, whether they are eight-year-old soccer players, senior executives, teachers or church volunteers, is the first critical step.

Why? Because it’s a lot easier to teach a humble, hard-working young man how to play goalie than it is to teach a spectacular athlete how to listen and put the team before himself. I’m guessing that applies to the organization where you work. Not the goalie part. Well, you know what I mean.

Yours,

Patrick Lincioni Signature

The Table Group - Consulting, Speaking, Publications: Resources - The Table Group Quarterly - Spring 2006

technorati tags:,

aloha & welcome 2006.09.28

Posted by Hakuna in uncategorized.
add a comment

allow me to acknowledge that i know there are millions of blogs out there and if you are here reading this, i am sincerely honored. it is my hope to present my thoughts & reflections on my life’s journey through this site.

my first purpose is simply to give me a place to reflect. my second hope is that because i have a tendency to see things from my own limited and narrow perspective, this becomes a place where you (thorough your comments) will help me “see” what i am missing but also share in what i am learning. lastly, the web has some incredible content and when i come across something worth sharing (entertaining or insightful), i will post it here for you.

so, whether you just visit once or return often, i hope you are blessed.

peace,

hakuna

                               
aloha

alo = presence
hâ = (divine) breath

More than a word of greeting or farewell, it is a blessing. It is only
to be used with sincerity: “‘Aloha’ could not be thoughtlessly or
indiscriminately spoken, for it carried its own power. No Hawaiian
could greet another with ‘Aloha’ unless he felt it in his own heart.
If he felt anger or hate in his heart, he had to cleanse himself
before he said ‘Aloha’.” ~Queen Lili`uokalani