jump to navigation

race matters! 2007.01.31

Posted by Hakuna in ethnicity & culture, racism, social commentary.
3 comments

this is a question and sentiment that i often hear asked or implied (usually by a european american male, but sometimes by individuals of color like Ward Connerly (photo to right)). it is one of my greatest frustrations as i have tried to help people see reality in north america.

i came across an article in the new york times yesterday that reminded me of why we must continue to be vigilant in our advocacy of those who are different from the norm or dominant group in our context here in north america, that means white european north americans.

most white north americans believe that we live life on a level playing field. in the u.s., that means that all americans are afforded the same opportunities and that with enough will and determination, any american can achieve anything. my mom tells me that when i was born, her father (my grandfather) called from okinawa and commented with admiration that i could someday be president of the united states because i was born in the u.s. his sentiment reflects this traditional american belief and value.

we (as americans) want to believe this about ourselves and this is most true for those of the dominant ethnic group because to believe otherwise would disrupt the status quo. the dynamics of dominant and sub-dominant in a system are not unique to north america so i want to emphasize that this is not a commentary on european americans as a people group. one can see this dynamic play itself out virtually every system in the world.

this short article at nytimes.com reported a recent study which showed that a primary factor in income for immigrants was the amount of melanin in one’s skin. in other words, how light or dark one’s skin is has a significant impact on one’s earning potential. “how significant an impact?” you ask. so much so that one shade lighter in skin tone has about the same impact “as having an additional year of education.” the study found that those with the lightest skin earned an average of 8 to 15 percent more than similar immigrants with much darker skin.

Dr. Hersch took into consideration other factors that could affect wages, like English-language proficiency, education, occupation, race or country of origin, and found that skin tone still seemed to make a difference in earnings. That meant that if two similar immigrants from Bangladesh, for example, came to the United States at the same time, with the same occupation and ability to speak English, the lighter-skinned one would make more money on average.

“I thought that once we controlled for race and nationality, I expected the difference to go away,” Dr. Hersch said, “but even with people from the same country, the same race, skin color really matters.”

Although many cultures show a bias toward lighter skin, she said her analysis showed that the skin-color advantage was not based on preferential treatment for light-skinned people in their country of origin. The bias, she said, occurs in the United States.

The New York Times: Study of Immigrants Links Lighter Skin and Higher Income

we live in a racialized society and race does indeed matter! it is more comfortable for us to believe that it does not because of who we want to believe we are as americans.

as an american, i am thankful and proud to live in a country that values freedom and equality! but “liberty and justice for all” is something we need to aspire to and and not something we have already achieved. it is not a reality that we enjoy today or have ever enjoyed in our country’s history.

columbus day: day of celebration or shame? 2006.10.09

Posted by Hakuna in ethnicity & culture, justice, racism.
5 comments

my earliest memory of celebrating columbus day was in third grade. all the kids from grades 3-5 commemorated the day by dressing in colonial style clothing (i wish i had a photo of me at eight years of age in knickers and my mom’s frilliest blouse to post for you!) and spent the day learning about columbus and the earliest settlers. we did everything from writing on slates with chalk to hand-making ice cream and it was an absolute blast! it was teaching and learning (through experience and fun) at its best! unfortunately, now as an adult, i’m not sure that the foundation to what i learned was all that accurate!

looking at history is never simple! winston churchill was absolutely correct when he said,

history is written by the victors.

but with that stated, it is often difficult to navigate through various and contradictory historical sources to find truth. most of us in the united states have been taught that christopher columbus was a great explorer/adventurer and that he courageously proved wrong the popular belief that the earth was flat. he is also the “discoverer” of america and a heroic figure to admire, emulate and remember. he is of such national import, that he is one of only ten federal holidays defined by law. since this reflects the “normal” way that columbus is taught and remembered, my focus in this post is on what most of us as school children were never taught.

the primary text that i will draw from is entitled, people’s history of the united states: 1492 to present by howard zinn. amazon’s editorial book description reads,

known for its lively, clear prose as well as its scholarly research, a people’s history of the united states is the only volume to tell america’s story from the point of view of — and in the words of — america’s women, factory workers, african- americans, native americans, working poor, and immigrant laborers.

in 1492, when columbus first arrived in the caribbean (thinking it was the indies), his very first act was kidnapping. here is a part of columbus’ log entry on that autumn day,

as soon as i arrived in the indies, on the first island which i found, i took some of the natives by force in order that they might learn and might give me information of whatever there is in these parts.

his barbarous act was unnecessary as later european observers described the arawaks of the bahamanian islands as much like the native peoples on the mainland, who were remarkable for their hospitality and belief in sharing. even columbus later described the “indians” he encountered like this:

they… brought us parrots and balls of cotton and spears and many other things, which they exchanged for the glass beads and hawks’ bells. they willingly traded everything they owned…. they were well-built, with good bodies and handsome features…. they do not bear arms, and do not know them, for i showed them a sword, they took it by the edge and cut themselves out of ignorance. they have no iron. their spears are made of cane…. they would make fine servants…. with fifty men we could subjugate them all and make them do whatever we want.

when columbus returned to europe thinking that he had succeeded in finding a shorter route to south asia, he exaggerated reports and promises to investors and so his second expedition was given seventeen ships and more than twelve hundred men – their primary objective was gold and slaves.

when they arrived back in the caribbean, they went from island to island capturing “indians”. columbus set up a base in haiti and proceeded to send numerous expeditions into the interior to look for gold, but they found none. since he had to fill up the ships returning to spain with some kind of dividend they began hunting. howard zinn writes,

in the year 1495, they went on a great slave raid, rounded up fifteen hundred arawak men, women, and children, put them in pens guarded by spaniards and dogs, then picked the five hundred best specimens to load onto ships. of those five hundred, two hundred died en route. the rest arrived alive in spain and were put up for sale by the archdeacon of the town, who reported that, although the slaves were ‘naked as the day they were born,’ they showed ‘no more embarrassment than animals.’ columbus later wrote: ‘let us in the name of the holy trinity go on sending all the slaves that can be sold.’

columbus and his men continued to believe that vast gold fields existed in haiti and so,

they ordered all persons fourteen years or older to collect a certain quantity of gold every three months. when they brought it, they were given copper tokens to hang around their necks. indians found without a copper token had their hands cut off and bled to death.

the indians had been given an impossible task. the only gold around was bits of dust garnered from the streams. so they fled, were hunted down with dogs, and were killed.

trying to put together an army of resistance, the arawaks faced spaniards who had armor, muskets, swords and horses. when the spaniards took prisoners they hanged them or burned them to death. among the arawaks, mass suicides began, with cassava poison. infants were killed to save them from the spaniards. in two years, through murder, mutilation, or suicide, half of the 250,000 indians on haiti were dead.

records indicate that by 1550, only 58 years after columbus first landed, only 500 arawak “indians” remained. the chief source that zinn uses to recount what happened on these islands after columbus arrived is from bartolome de las casas. las casas was a young priest who participated in the conquest of cuba and for a time, even owned a plantation with indian slaves, but to his credit he repented and became a vehement critic of spanish cruelty.

book two of his history of the indies relates the atrocities committed against the “indians” by the spaniards. here are a few excerpts from zinn’s book:

the spaniards ‘grew more conceited every day’ and after a while refused to walk any distance. they ‘rode the backs of indians if they were in a hurry’ or were carried on hammocks by indians running in relays. ‘in this case they also had indians carry large leaves to shade them from the sun and others to fan them with goose wings.’

total control led to total cruelty. the spaniards ‘thought nothing of knifing indians by tens and twenties and of cutting slices off them to test the sharpness of their blades.’ las casas tells how ‘two of these so-called christians met two indian boys one day, each carrying a parrot; they took the parrots and for fun beheaded the boys.’

when he arrived on hispaniola in 1508, las casas says, ‘there were 60,000 people living on this island, including the indians; so that from 1494 to 1508, over three million people had perished from war, slavery, and the mines. who in future generations will believe this? i myself writing it as a knowledgeable eyewitness can hardly believe it….’

the history books i grew up with said that columbus was the hero in a heroic adventure. they told me of no deceit, avarice, kidnapping, slavery, murder or genocide. the real story behind christopher columbus helps me to better understand how our country grew and developed in the manner that it did. it also helps me to understand how and why we, as a nation, operate in the ways that we do today. don’t get me wrong! i am extremely thankful to have been born in america and i believe in our country’s principles of “justice and liberty for all”. i dream of a day when this stated american value is truly descriptive of who we are as a nation domestically and internationally.

the first step in getting there is to acknowledge who we really are today and to do that, we have to understand the trajectory from where we have come.

dr. carl sagan said,

you have to know the past to understand the present.

is god colorblind? (part one) 2006.10.03

Posted by Hakuna in christian, ethnicity & culture, racism.
1 comment so far

there’s an interesting article in the new york times today entitled, “a racial rift that isn’t black and white” (free-registration required). it’s about two ministers – one latino and one african american – in the south who have a strong friendship in the midst significant tensions between their respective ethnic communities.


The Revs. Atanacio Gaona, left, and Harvey Williams Jr. in Willacoochee, Ga., where the two men each have a church. They have forged a friendship that transcends the divide between Hispanics and blacks.

it’s a hopeful article (which in the news nowadays is difficult to find), but i found one comment that rev. gaona, the latino pastor, makes very disturbing. what he said was said with the best of intentions and i have heard many christians say exactly this kind of thing over the years. in the article, while describing the close nature of his relationship with pastor williams, rev. gaona is quoted as saying,

In the eyes of the Lord, there are no colors.

nothing could be further from the truth rev. gaona! scripture clearly supports the very opposite notion: ethnicity, culture and language are eternal.

in the book of revelations, the apostle john describes his vision of heaven and the end times. in chapter 7, he paints a picture of god’s heavenly throne room and there, he says in verse 9,

After this I looked and there before me was a great multitude that no one could count, from every nation, tribe, people and language, standing before the throne and in front of the Lamb. They were wearing white robes and were holding palm branches in their hands.

so, here’s the scene: john is bearing witness to the last act in the drama of human redemptive history. there’s an immense assemblage before god’s heavenly throne and although all are clothed in white, john “sees” people from every nation (ethnos) and tribe. he also “hears” a multitude of languages being used to worship the lord god almighty.

there’s a lot about life in heaven that scripture is silent on and until we get there, we are left to ponder, speculate and imagine about the rest. one of the preciously few things that god has made absolutely clear to us about the kingdom of heaven is that it is thoroughly multi-ethnic and multi-lingual. ethnicity, culture and language are apparently so precious to god that he has deemed them to be eternal aspects of our personal and communal identities. in essence, they are a fundamental part of our souls.

the “eyes of the lord” are not color-blind! furthermore, those who perpetuate the idea that unity depends on our ability to either tolerate or ignore difference do greater harm than they realize. it is a crime against both heaven and earth.

‘ukulele 2006.09.29

Posted by Hakuna in ethnicity & culture, music.
add a comment


(pronounced: oo-kuu-leh-leh)

this musical instrument is possibly one of the most misrepresented and disrespected (next to spoons and kuzoos) in the world. jake shimabukro, hawaiian born uchinanchu (”okinawan” in the okinawan language), is a ‘ukulele musician that will instantly change your understanding of this little guitar-like instrument. 100s of google video viewers agree with me aparently agree with me given it’s 5 out of 5 star rating!

over the summer, while in hawai’i, i visited a number of musical instrument shops looking at and playing various ‘ukuleles. i fell in love with the sound and feel of gstring ‘ukuleles. you can’t hear the beautiful resonate sounds here but if you want to see the amazing craftsmanship of one of these instruments and works of art, go here: http://www.gstringukuleles.com/.